Millionares in the Mist

Here's Something quick for my "audience" to discuss.

Some local kids, one a victim of the "civil war" in Sudan, on a local radio program were talking about the mating customs of Sudanese people. They were saying how Sudanese men can take many wives—as long as they “have the money” to take care of them. This perhaps seeks to make Africans appear more primitive?

However primitive Africans may be, the only difference between Anglo-American and Africans, with respect to their mating habits, is that the polygamy of some dominant Africans is well known since it is publicized whereas the “polygamy” of Anglo-American dominant men is more covertly expressed in the burgeoning prostitution, child and adult prostitution, afforded only by American and other white, European men that “have the money;” American publicists have erected a morality that is impossible to adhere to so the members of the American monied class take many “wives” in secret and abuse them and exploit them, as opposed to the much more civilized practice of Africans who actually support and love their wives, maybe not ideally so, but the practices of the average African is definitely no more cruel than raping child sex-slaves, of which over 100,000 exist in the U.S. by many reports.

In fact, a report on CSEC(commercian sexual explotation of children)that was released one day before 911, a report prepard by faculty of the University of Pennsylvania, reveals the brutality right here in the U.S. that goes mostly unnoticed and almost completely unreported in the United States presses.

Huh.

Ask Not What Your President Can Do for Your Country

The following letter is a to National Public Radio. I needed to tell them what I though of having coverage of the presidential "election" start 1.75 years before the election:

Dear NPR,

Wow, you guys are really giving 911 coverage a run for its money with all of the "coverage" of the presidential "race" (there must be some really important legislation being drafted right now, perhaps that which would make it obligatory to relinquish all first-born children to the U.S. Treasury Department for sex slavery enrollment, eh). The last time there was this much filler in the news was the few days after 9-11.

I recall that on 9-13-2001, China, an economy of well over a billion workers, was very quietly entered into the WTO, being granted normalized trade status or some such thing. Even though this news was the hugest thing to happen to all Americans since the Great Depression, a thing that drastically affected their wallets instead of just pulling on their heart strings and playing head games, all I heard about it was one little 100 word brief article in my local newspaper.

Here we had the largest population on the planet Earth ever to be included in the global market place on such a scale and all at once--and barely a peep.

Now, every gesture, burp, fart or general irrelevancy that each "candidate" pollutes us with is supposed to be news?!?!?!?!?

With all of the resources you spend on the mythos of presidential politics and Presidential campaign PR every day, couldn't you find a way to put all that energy into finding ways to just allow a world where people know that U.S. "Presidents" are chosen by "elite" money "trusts" (mistrusts) according to public sentiment and the next 4 year plan. Wouldn't it be easier to just tell everyone once and for all that, "There is no such thing as 'The President'. World policy is decided in revolving, perpetual board meetings that never really end. The several very highly educated, albeit indoctrinated and self-justifying, individuals who take responsibility for the socioeconomic fate of all earthlings take variables into consideration that the average citizen doesn't even realize exist." Then, once every one is on the level, you could just give them 5 minutes of news every day, thus freeing up all of your millions of newsroom, PR firm, thinktank, roundtable, etc employees--who produce lots of smoke and nothing of much use to the population at large--to find more productive, useful vocations. If they then find it hard to find work due to only being qualified to produce bull feces, there are many jobs out there, such as pumping gas, washing dishes, or bagging groceries, all of which they should qualify for.

Thank you for your time and your consideration. I hope this letter helped in some way by either informing you or providing solutions.

[Omnimental]

Now, here is their reply:

Dear [Omnimental] ,



Thank you for contacting NPR's Office of the Ombudsman.

The points you made about NPR’s coverage of the presidential elections have been considered by our staff, as we continue to strive for accuracy and communication within the newsroom.

Thanks again for writing in, and for your continued support of public broadcasting. For the latest news and information, visit NPR.org.




Sincerely,

Chantal de la Rionda
Assistant to the Ombudsman
National Public Radio
635 Massachusetts Ave NW
Washington, DC 20001